Rhea Chakraborty recently opened up about her side of the story, speaking about Sushant Singh Rajput’s tryst with drugs, his relationship with his family and even the many financial allegations being levelled against her.
Now in an exclusive interaction with ETimes, Shekhar Suman raised several counter questions against Rhea Chakraborty. He said, “She slandered and vilified their image completely. I strongly feel that everybody should be given a chance to speak. So that’s fair enough that, she was given an opportunity. I’m not against that because they always two sides and we must hear both the sides of the story. We cannot just say that somebody is a convict, we can say that the person is a suspect but nothing beyond that. So under the circumstances, she seems a little suspicious, which was why there were certain allegations and she should have come out right in the beginning and cleared whatever she had to. The fact that she went into hiding for about 70 days, citing emotional reasons, and the fact that she respected Sushant, et cetera, then what prompted her to come out now? I mean, the respect should have continued or did it end now? What happened?
He also went on to say “Rhea brought so much of disrepute and dishonor, right from character assassination to everything. She painted the family with the wrong brush, picking each one of them. Rhea said that Sushant was never abusive in the relationship and on the other hand she says that he gets up on the morning of June 8 and says get out and he was shouting. Why did you leave him if you loved him so much in the condition that he was. You would probably make more efforts to stay back, what kind of love are you talking about? Then Rhea says that Sushant’s relationship with father was not right, they hadn’t met for five years, thereby saying that the father was also bad and the son was also bad. So basically it was a dysfunctional family? Secondly, Rhea said that the sister was groping me inappropriately. That means she was a drunkard and a queer, with no character? Third thing is the brother in law and his wife, the eldest sister. That why were they laughing and enjoying lunch instead of filing a complaint. So towards the end, whichever angle you see, Rhea was like ten on ten, miss goody two shoes, with a squeaky clean, perfect lover image. While Sushant was depressive, hypomaniac, bipolar, claustrophobic, drug addict, insensitive and his family was after the money, so all of that was in such bad taste. It just looks like Rhea was trying to exonerate herself, exculpate and put the entire blame on the family and Sushant. So it seemed absolutely bizarre.”
Add comment